<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
  <title>Miraeweb Insights</title>
  <link>https://www.miraeweb.com/en/blog/</link>
  <description>Enterprise UI, data grids and developer tools — Miraeweb</description>
  <language>en</language>
  <atom:link href="https://www.miraeweb.com/en/blog/rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
  <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</lastBuildDate>
  <item>
    <title>"We Used the Open Source Version" — The Defence That Closes Itself</title>
    <link>https://www.miraeweb.com/en/blog/open-source-defense/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.miraeweb.com/en/blog/open-source-defense/</guid>
    <description>The most common answer to a dual-licence infringement claim in Asia-Pacific is that the open source build was used. It is an admission, not a defence. Here is why, and where it actually holds.</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>
